|FOR IMMEDIATE FREE RELEASE
Tuesday, October 22, 2013
|Contact: John R. Polito|
What if you were tasked with writing the annual shareholder's report for the largest cigarette company in the world, Philip Morris International (PMI)? How would you describe the core foundation of PMI's business, nicotine addiction? And how would you handle the fact that during 2012 the vast majority of new regular customers were addicted children and teens?
Nicotine dependence is a true mental illness, a brain wanting disorder in which compromised dopamine pathways assign nicotine use the same priority as they assign to eating food.
The wanting, urges and craves felt by the nicotine addict flow from the same brain circuitry as the wanting, urges and craves felt by the alcoholic and by the opiate, cocaine and methamphetamine addict. It is as permanent as alcoholism and there is no known cure.
There was a time when Philip Morris was comfortable with the mantra that smoking is a "free-choice" activity. But that assertion is now totally inconsistent with its website admission that "smoking is addictive." It's also inconsistent with studies showing that 86.8 percent of students who smoke nicotine at least once daily are already chemically dependent under DSM mental health standards, as are 90 percent of adult smokers.
While Philip Morris's 2012 Annual Report makes 176 references to "earnings" and 192 to "income," the word "nicotine" is mentioned just 5 times, and never in relation to addiction, but only as a chemical within cigarettes.
Instead, PMI proudly boasts "robust performance" and "spectacular results" by "the most profitable publicly traded tobacco company in the world."
What's actually being sold (chemical addiction) is treated as top secret. What isn't kept secret is the new 2012 marketing campaign that "is proving successful and contributed to the market share growth of [PMI's] flagship brand in 2012."
Marlboro "maybe" ads bring Philip Morris' "1991 Archetype Project" to fruition as neuronal pathways are built between a child or teen's dreams of success and a wonderful life, and the act of smoking Marlboro: "Maybe never fell in love," "Maybe never wrote a song," "Maybe never learned to fly," "Maybe never reached the top," "Maybe never rocks," "Maybe will never be her own boss," "Freedom does not start with a maybe," "Maybe never feels free," "Maybe never found a way," "Maybe never will," "Maybe never wins," Don't be a maybe," No more maybe, "Be."
"Our growth is testament to the resilience of our business," "organic cigarette shipment volume reached 927 billion units, an increase of 1.3% versus 2011," PMI asserts on page 1.
But what percentage of that increase was associated with youth smoking? According to the Centers for Disease Control, 88% of adult smokers who smoke daily report that they started smoking by the age of 18 years.
The words "teen," "teenager," "adolescent" and "student" do not appear in PMI's 98 page report. The word "child" is mentioned once, in regard to "child labor" on page 35, and the word "children" appears three times but not once in relation to children smoking.
The report does mention "youth" eight times: (1) page 29 refers to the World Health Organization's goal "to prevent youth smoking"; (2) page 30 twice asserts that plain cigarette packs now required in Australia will not reduce youth smoking; (3) page 31 claims that government bans on cigarette ingredients will not reduce youth smoking; (4) on page 32, PMI agrees to a ban of any cigarette ingredient that "sound scientific testing, methods and data" proves will "significantly increase" "youth smoking initiation"; (5) on page 33 PMI denies any relationship between a cigarette's design and "youth smoking initiation"; (6) on page 34 PMI throws students a bone in supporting a ban on smoking in schools and other youth facilities; and (7) on page 34 it wants governments to more strictly enforce laws against illicit tobacco products in order to protect youth from being exposed to cheaper cigarettes.
Yes, 8 youth references but only two in which PMI pretends corporate concern for the world's youth: one totally obvious and the other promising PMI greater profits.
Absent is any leadership by the world's leading cigarette seller in moving to insulate the world's children from both the conscious and subliminal influence of Marlboro's Maybe ads, from PMI's "Go Ahead" brand, and from all other Philip Morris marketing that repeatedly assaults, teases, entices and then enslaves.
The 2012 Annual Report's marketing tactic is to distract readers from the true nature of PMI's business by focusing attention on the happy faces of PMI employees. In the words of PMI's CEO, "Our company is blessed with a diverse pool of superb talent that, with unwavering passion and commitment to excellence, is the driving force behind our performance."
Hidden from those many pages of smiling faces are the millions of newly addicted youth who smoked most of the 12 billion additional cigarettes that PMI boasts selling.
One would think that investors would shy away from investing in the legal drug addiction business, an industry totally dependent upon enslaving young, gullible and immature minds. But apparently, for many, money is more important than concerns about chemically enslaving children for life.
Philip Morris International
- Marlboro "Maybe" Archetype Ad Campaign - October 29, 2013 - Is Philip Morris International (PMI) currently toying with neuronal definition imprinting within a child's subconscious mind? View 45 Marlboro "Maybe" ads and contrast the lessons being taught to a 1991 Philip Morris study entitled the "Archetype Project."
- Marlboro maker's report ignores youth addiction - October 22, 2013 - Article reviews how Philip Morris International's 2012 Annual Report ignores discussing PMI's core business, nicotine addiction, or the fact that the vast majority of new regular customers were addicted children and teens.
- Nicotine Patch Inventor Fudges Patch Study Findings - July 12, 2009 - Why would Philip Morris fund a nicotine patch smoking cessation study (see 2004 Funding Agreement)? Although not shared in this article, the answer is simple: PM knows that replacement nicotine is horribly ineffective (see July 2013 Gallup Poll).
- Philip Morris revises "Raising kids who don't smoke" - December 5, 2005 - Why parents wanting to teach their child or teen the unabridged truth about smoking might be wise to select a teacher other than Philip Morris USA
- Philip Morris' "Could your kid be smoking?" - August 8, 2005 - A critical review of Philip Morris USA's third sixteen-page youth smoking prevention brochure entitled, Could your kid be smoking?
- Understanding Philip Morris's pursuit of US government regulation of tobacco, McDaniel, PA, et al, Tobacco Control, Volume 14, Number 3, Pages 193-200, June 2005 (link to free full text article)
- Financial Ties and Conflicts of Interest Between Pharmaceutical and Tobacco Companies - 2002 - a study detailing Philip Morris' uneasy partnership with the pharmaceutical industry, and why you have never and never will hear any nicotine replacement product commerical tell you why you need to quit, because smoking kills.
- Philip Morris' Mission Exploration Project - June 27, 2000 - A 140 page PDF file outlining Philip Morris USA's plan for, in part, transforming itself into a highly respected nicotine pharmaceutical company, the same vision RJ Reynolds had in 1972.
- Philip Morris' Archetype Project - August 20, 1991 - A 16 page PDF file detailing what Philip Morris USA learned from its archetype sessions about imprinting smoking upon the neuronal pathways of a child's brain.
Share this youth smoking prevention article
WhyQuit's basic "how to quit smoking" video
|Knowledge is a Quitting Method!|